Enter a person's full name and their company's domain, and get a ranked list of the most statistically common corporate email address patterns for that combination — useful as a starting point before you verify.
This is a pattern generator, not a database lookup — it doesn't search any external service, scrape LinkedIn, or query a database of real email addresses. Instead, it applies the ten most common corporate email naming conventions (first.last, flast, first initial + last, and so on) to the name and domain you provide, and ranks the resulting candidates by how frequently each pattern tends to appear across organizations generally.
This is meaningfully different from — and more transparent than — 'email finder' services that claim to search scraped databases, since it makes clear exactly how each candidate was derived and doesn't claim any confirmed match. If you already know one real address at the target company, the Email Format Checker will give you a much more targeted prediction based on that company's actual, confirmed pattern rather than generic frequency.
None of the generated candidates are confirmed to exist. Before relying on one — especially for anything beyond casual outreach — run it through the Email Deliverability Tester to confirm at least that the domain has active mail servers, and consider cross-referencing with a company directory, press page, or a professional network profile if the contact is important enough to warrant it.
Because none of these candidates are confirmed, it's worth treating the exercise as narrowing a search rather than finding an answer — start with the top-ranked pattern, and if outreach through that address bounces or goes unanswered, work down the list rather than assuming the first guess was correct. Keeping a simple log of which patterns you've already tried for a given company can also save time if you need to reach a second or third person there later, since the confirmed pattern will apply to everyone at that domain.
No. It generates plausible candidates based on common naming patterns only — it does not verify that any specific address exists or belongs to the named person.
Paid services typically claim to cross-reference scraped or purchased contact databases and give a confidence score based on matches found elsewhere. This tool only applies naming-pattern logic locally — it has no database and makes no such claims.
first.last@domain is the single most common corporate pattern globally, which is why it's always listed first, but the actual pattern varies by company, region and company size.
Yes — use the Email Format Checker instead. Providing one confirmed address lets it detect that specific company's actual pattern rather than relying on general frequency.
Rules vary by jurisdiction and context — regulations like GDPR and CAN-SPAM place limits on unsolicited commercial email in many regions. This tool doesn't provide legal advice; check applicable rules for your situation before using generated candidates for outreach.